Systematics Collections Data

PDD 80658 – Hydnum wellingtonii Lloyd

Data provider:
New Zealand Fungarium - Te Kohinga Hekaheka o Aotearoa
Barcode:
PDD 80658
Specimen type:
Packet
Loan status:
Active
Database record added:
01 April 2010
Database record updated:
11 February 2024
Components
Primary component
Active identification
Determined name:
Hydnum wellingtonii
Determiner:
J.A. Cooper
Identification date:
2023 (Verbatim: 2023)
Preferred name:
Hydnum wellingtonii Lloyd
Division:
Basidiomycota
Class:
Agaricomycetes
Order:
Cantharellales
Family:
Hydnaceae
Identification type:
Determination
Associations:
has host Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides × fusca
Other identifications
Identification
Determined name:
Hydnum crocidens var. wellingtonii
Determiner:
J.A. Cooper
Identification date:
Preferred name:
Hydnum wellingtonii Lloyd
Active:
no
Identification type:
Determination
Other components
Active identification
Determined name:
Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides × fusca
Determiner:
Identification date:
Preferred name:
Nothofagus solandri var. cliffortioides × fusca
Division:
Tracheophyta
Class:
Magnoliopsida
Order:
Fagales
Family:
Nothofagaceae
Identification type:
Determination
Present:
no
Collection events
Primary collection event
Collection event type:
Unknown
Standard locality
Location:
Arthur's Pass
Georeferences:
Latitude and Longitude (WGS84):  -42.9242  171.552 
Verbatim locality:
Arthurs Pass
Verbatim collector:
J.A. Cooper
Standardised collector:
J. A. Cooper
Collectors reference no.:
JAC9106
Verbatim date:
2004/09/29
Start date:
2004-09-29
Country:
New Zealand
New Zealand Area Codes:
North Canterbury
Native lands:
Ngāi Tahu
Georeferences:
New Zealand Map Grid:  2392665E 5807120N  (WGS84 -42.934171 171.562316)
Habitat:
Beech forest
Specimen notes
Public Note:
Cap and teeth orange-buff. Older specimen umber. Cap to 2 cm, stipe eccentric, teeth decurrent. Agrees with McNabb's var. However Australia checklist has crocidens synonimized with repandum. This is very small and insufficiently robust for repandum? Although Geesteranus thinks there is a continnumn and all crocidens is repandum. Geesteranus accepts difference of repandum from rufescens by decurremt versus bare patch at stem apex - but then says its a dodgy character. Molecular work seems limited at present but rufescens and repandum come together. umbilicatum is different.
Assigned reference numbers
JA Cooper Fungarium:
JAC9106
Permissions
Project permits
Reference:
PDD Collection - Local Contexts
Biocultural (BC) Notice