No 682 would be M. erosulus as labelled though quite an unstisfactory species vis-vis M. prorepens, but Dixon agrees that they are better kept apart though there are clear intermediates. This specimen is not so bad and has the merit of being at least as much erosulum as one from Mitten's own herbarium.
GOKS in litt. 31/3/44
GOKS [Sainsbury GOK], 31/3/44
Supplementary remarks:
Keying to M prorepens/M. submucronifolium in my key version 29 March 2012
Setae=4.0, 4.0, 4.0, 4.5, 4.2
Leaves mostly 1.5 mm ... little variation
Upper lamina cells in cross-section between 6 and 12 µm wide; middle lamellae not obvious;
Costae excurrent into apiculus
Inner basal cells linear, mostly 24-33 µm;
I cannot apply Vitt's trabeculae character
Allan Fife, March 2012