Systematics Collections Data

CHR 454197 – Dicranoloma obesifolium (R.Br.bis) Broth.

Data provider:
Allan Herbarium
Barcode:
CHR 454197
Specimen type:
Packet
Database record added:
30 July 2001
Database record updated:
24 February 2023
Components
Primary component
Active identification
Determined name:
Dicranoloma obesifolium (R.Br.bis) Broth.
Determiner:
Allan Fife
Identification date:
2016-12 (Verbatim: December 2016)
Preferred name:
Dicranoloma obesifolium (R.Br.bis) Broth.
Division:
Bryophyta
Class:
Bryatae
Family:
Dicranaceae
Identification type:
Determination
Note:
This is a problematic collection. In its overall habit and colouration it compares exceedingly well to the two Tasmanian collections of D. eucamptodontoides that I have seen (both in WELT). However, in NZ D. obesifolium is variable with respect to costal length (failing far below the leaf apex to sometimes percurrent and variable in single shoots), set of leaves, shoot form (cuspidate or not), and pigmentation (only rarely black, as in this collection). I continue to believe that Glenny 5133 (as well as the similar JK Bartlett collection from Percy Saddle) is merely aberrant material of the widespread D. obesifolium. I have seen too little material of D. eucamptodontoides (and no type material) from Tasmania to allow the firm conclusions about the status of that name. If D. obesifolium were to be conspecific, the Tasmanian name would have priority. CHR 532469 (AJF 10057) from Kelly Range is exceedingly like the present collecton in overall habit, costal length, colouration (albeit it is not so black as Glenny 5133), leaf shape and dimensions. CHR 532469 in my opinion is also aberrant D. obesifolium. CHR 428940 (J. Child 4383) from Gertude Saddle has most costae in most leaves percurrent, while in others the costae seem absent. In other respects it is quite representative of D. obesifolium.
Other identifications
Identification
Determined name:
Dicranoloma obesifolium (R.Br.bis.) Broth.
Determiner:
Allan Fife
Identification date:
2000-06 (Verbatim: June-2000)
Preferred name:
Dicranoloma obesifolium (R.Br.bis) Broth.
Active:
no
Identification type:
Determination
Identification
Determined name:
Dicranoloma eucamptodontoides (Broth. & Geh.) Par.
Determiner:
D Glenny
Identification date:
1994-02-10 (Verbatim: 10-Feb-1994)
Preferred name:
Dicranoloma (Renauld) Renauld
Active:
no
Identification type:
Determination
Identification
Determined name:
Dicranum obesifolium R.Br.ter.
Determiner:
Allan Fife
Identification date:
1994-03 (Verbatim: March-1994)
Preferred name:
Dicranoloma obesifolium (R.Br.bis) Broth.
Active:
no
Identification type:
Determination
Collection events
Primary collection event
Collection event type:
Field
Standard locality
Location:
Southland, Eyre Mountains, Symmetry Peaks
Georeferences:
Latitude and Longitude (WGS84):  -45.2829  168.595 
Verbatim locality:
Southland, Eyre Mountains, Symmetry Peaks
Verbatim collector:
D Glenny 5133
Standardised collector:
David Glenny
Verbatim date:
10-Feb-1994
Start date:
1994-02-10
Country:
New Zealand
Land District:
Southland Land District
Native lands:
Ngāi Tahu
Georeferences:
New Zealand Map Series 260:   E42 645 380  (WGS84 -45.282869 168.595074)
Altitudes:
from 1390m
Habitat:
Chionochloa crassiusscula + Schoenus pauciflorus / Carpha alpina sedgeland on hillslope.
Notes:
Ex Herbarium, Museum of New Zealand, Wellington. WELT M . Substrate: peat. ( A single specimen from the Eyre Mts. in Southland (D. Glenny 5133) has been examined with leaves nearly black on a 20 mm portion of the stem, but representative of the species in all other respects. The pigmentation, occuring in the laminal cells walls, is interpreted as resulting from periodic inundation or waterlogging. Similar darkly pigmented plants occur in D. robustum when growing in waterlogged habitats. Allan Fife June 2000.) [See other notes enclosed.]
Specimen notes
Supplementary remarks:
This is a problematic collection. In its overall habit and colouration it compares exceedingly well to the two Tasmanian collections of D. eucamptodontoides that I have seen (both in WELT). However, in NZ D. obesifolium is variable with respect to costal length (failing far below the leaf apex to sometimes percurrent and variable in single shoots), set of leaves, shoot form (cuspidate or not), and pigmentation (only rarely black, as in this collection). I continue to believe that Glenny 5133 (as well as the similar JK Bartlett collection from Percy Saddle) is merely aberrant material of the widespread D. obesifolium. I have seen too little material of D. eucamptodontoides (and no type material) from Tasmania to allow the firm conclusions about the status of that name. If D. obesifolium were to be conspecific, the Tasmanian name would have priority. CHR 532469 (AJF 10057) from Kelly Range is exceedingly like the present collecton in overall habit, costal length, colouration (albeit it is not so black as Glenny 5133), leaf shape and dimensions. CHR 532469 in my opinion is also aberrant D. obesifolium. CHR 428940 (J. Child 4383) from Gertude Saddle has most costae in most leaves percurrent, while in others the costae seem absent. In other respects it is quite representative of D. obesifolium.
Allan Fife, December 2016
Permissions
Project permits
Reference:
CHR Collection - Local Contexts
Biocultural (BC) Notice