PDD 83784 – Dendrosporium sp. 'Lake Stream Track (PDD 76603)' J.A. Cooper ined.
Data provider:
New Zealand Fungarium - Te Kohinga Hekaheka o Aotearoa
Barcode:
PDD 83784
Specimen type:
Packet
Loan status:
Active
Database record added:
01 April 2010
Database record updated:
24 February 2023
Components
Primary component
Active identification
Determined name:
Dendrosporium sp. 'Lake Stream Track (PDD 76603)'
Determiner:
J.A. Cooper
Identification date:
Preferred name:
Dendrosporium sp. 'Lake Stream Track (PDD 76603)' J.A. Cooper ined.
Division:
Ascomycota
Identification type:
Determination
Associations:
has host Beilschmiedia tawa
Substrate:
leaf, dead, incubated
Other components
Active identification
Determined name:
Beilschmiedia tawa
Determiner:
Identification date:
Preferred name:
Beilschmiedia tawa (A.Cunn.) Kirk
Division:
Tracheophyta
Class:
Magnoliopsida
Order:
Laurales
Family:
Lauraceae
Identification type:
Determination
Present:
no
Collection events
Primary collection event
Collection event type:
Unknown
Standard locality
Location:
Mangamuka Gorge
Georeferences:
Latitude and Longitude (WGS84):
-35.1908 173.456
Verbatim locality:
Mangamuka Gorge
Verbatim collector:
T.J. Atkinson, J.A. Cooper
Standardised collector:
Toni J. Atkinson; J. A. Cooper
Collectors reference no.:
JAC 9642
Verbatim date:
2004/08/13
Start date:
2004-08-13
Country:
New Zealand
New Zealand Area Codes:
Northland
Native lands:
Ngāti Kahu
Te Rarawa
Georeferences:
New Zealand Map Grid:
2552305E 6667745N (WGS84 -35.190773 173.455545)
Habitat:
Podocarp forest bog
Specimen notes
Public Note:
could be 'splat' sp. nov.? Material also has Endophragmiella and Isthmolongispora. To ICMP 25/10/05 see 9643. Species same as 8493. Not C. dendroides as that with less bumps, bigger, and on dark, robust conidiophores. Conidia 9 x 7um, conidiophores hyaline, pale yellow.
Replay to Ludmilla Marvanova asking about relationship to candelabroides and her taxon from Indonesia.
"There are two reasons why I think it 'may' be different to Candelabroides sensu stricto. First is that Castanedas description and drawing show brown pigmented conidiophores and hyphae whereas as mine, as you can see from my images, has hyaline hyphae and conidiophores. This could be a artefact because I am looking at cultures (which are yeasty, slow growing, and pale yellow), but even a search of the original material does not indicate pigmented hyphae. The second is that Castneda's drawing shows conidia with only 2, or at most 4, deep indentations whereas mine show several deep petal-like cuts. On the other hand Matsushimas description agrees with my material. He says the conidiophores and hyphae are 'subhyaline to light fuscous' and his conidia are certainly close to mine. I think it impossible to be sure unles all the material is examined side-by-side. On the basis of the printed material available to me I would say that my material and Matsushima's are conspecific but their relationship to Castaneda's D. candelabroides remains uncertain. "
External links
CIS - ICMP:
Assigned reference numbers
JA Cooper Fungarium:
JAC9642
Permissions
Project permits
Biocultural (BC) Notice
