CHR 632364
– Rhizogonium pennatum Hook.f. & Wilson
Data provider:
Allan Herbarium
Barcode:
CHR 632364
Specimen type:
Sheet
Database record added:
11 November 2013
Database record updated:
21 June 2023
Components
Primary component
Active identification
Determined name:
Rhizogonium pennatum H.f. & W.
Determiner:
Allan Fife
Identification date:
1994-03 (Verbatim: 3 / 1994)
Preferred name:
Rhizogonium pennatum Hook.f. & Wilson
Division:
Bryophyta
Class:
Bryatae
Family:
Rhizogoniaceae
Identification type:
Determination
Other identifications
Identification
Determined name:
Rhizogonium aristatum Hampe
Determiner:
[Beckett TWN]
Identification date:
Preferred name:
Rhizogonium pennatum Hook.f. & Wilson
Active:
no
Identification type:
Determination
Identification
Determined name:
Hymenodon
Determiner:
[Bell W]
Identification date:
Preferred name:
Hymenodon Hook.f. & Wilson
Active:
no
Identification type:
Determination
Type status:
Type
Collection events
Primary collection event
Collection event type:
Field
Standard locality
Location:
Halfmoon Bay, Stewart Island / Rakiura
Georeferences:
Latitude and Longitude (WGS84):
-46.898664 168.126909
Verbatim locality:
Half Moon Bay, Stewart Island
Verbatim collector:
[Bell W] 715
Standardised collector:
W. Bell
Verbatim date:
Jany 189 [1889]
Start date:
1889-01
Country:
New Zealand
Land District:
Southland Land District
Native lands:
Ngāi Tahu
Georeferences:
Latitude and Longitude (WGS84):
-46.89 168.124
Habitat:
stems of tree ferns
Specimen notes
Herbarium history:
[Herb. T.W.N. Beckett]
Herbarium history:
Ex herb. W. Bell
Supplementary remarks:
WB 715 Stewart I
Certainly not Hymenodon - ? an undescribed Rhizogonium - Margins with a thick cartilaginous border - entire except toward the apex where there are a few teeth. 1 or 2 on a side. Nerve stout excurrent in a long subulate point. Apex of the leaves very frequently unequal.
[Beckett TWN]
Supplementary remarks:
The year of the collecting date for this speimen is "189". In databasing this specimen I interpreted this as 1889, but it could be that a fourth (and spaced) digit was cut off the original Bell label. The specimen therefore could have been collected any time from 1889 to 1899.
Gibb ES, Nov 2013